First Official Rant…I Don’t Get It!
This idea of “subheads”. If you look at direct response copy you’ll see a lot of very lame subheads.
This is either directly or indirectly being taught and it is VERY damaging to the power of your copy.
We need our subheads to be powerful. Sure the headline may be the most powerful but why not use this dynamic throughout your sales letter?
Why not?
Especially today. We know that readers are skimming very quickly. Doesn’t it make sense that we should plant strong headlines throughout the copy?
I call them Body Copy Headlines.
If you go to my site at www.DynamicResponseMarketing.com you’ll see what I mean.
Body Copy Headlines NOT Lame Subheads.
Directly or Indirectly teaching this is just wrong.

Comment by John A. Manley
March 30, 2006 @ 6:08 am
I think I’m getting near 90% “there” with this Shaune…
Yesterday’s class brought me up 10% more (from already thinking I was 90% there).
Like you’re saying here, we all know how important headlines are. The “80% of your copy’s success” is in the headline.
So why are we using only headline one per copy?
It totally illogical!
Who programmed us this way???
I think I can even use this idea for Yellow Pages ads. I ended up with a lame subhead in a recent YP ad because I was concerned about space restrictions.
But how you demonstrated to us last night with Cheri’s critique made me realize I can stil do it.
Great picture above!
When does David’s ship dock?
John
John A. Manley
A “Live” Online Look at the Day to Day Life of a Fulltime Copywriter From Starving Writer (Day One) to…?